Development of Novel Antibiotic Alternatives

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to two recombinant colicin expression systems, one utilizing a yeast expression system that produces a protein that is inexpensive to purify, and the other utilizing a plasmid expression system to be used as a probiotic culture. The recombinant colicins provide effective alternatives to conventional antibiotics and may be used to improve the efficiency of pork production, and the safety of its products.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It is estimated that over 50% of all economic losses in weaned pigs are due to Escherichia coli infections, causing either diarrhea or edema disease. In addition to the E. coli strains responsible for disease in pigs, other E. coli, as well as Salmonella, strains also colonize the intestinal tract of pigs. Many of these strains are of major concern for human food safety. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that in the year 2000 over 1.4 million people suffered and more than 600 died, in this country, from foodborne disease caused by Salmonella and E. coli 0157:H7. The costs attributed to these diseases were approximately $3.1 billion.

The bacterial strains considered primarily responsible for E. coli infections in pigs, F4 (K88) and F18, are not well controlled by traditional prophylactic antibiotic treatments. With worldwide concerns over the use of prophylactic antibiotics in animal agriculture, the development of alternatives to conventional antibiotics is urgently needed to protect swine from these E. coli infections.

Probiotics have been explored as one alternative to the use of conventional antibiotics. A “probiotic” strategy is one that employs the use of microflora to reduce pathogenic bacteria (including food-bourne pathogens) in the gut. Probiotic techniques involve the introduction of a healthy microbial population to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, or providing a limiting nutrient, sometimes termed a “prebiotic”, that allows an existing commensal microbial population to expand its role in the gastrointestinal tract. The addition of a non-pathogenic microbial culture to the intestinal tract of food animals in order to reduce colonization or decrease populations of pathogenic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract is referred to as “competitive exclusion”.

Competitive exclusion cultures may be composed of a single strain, several strains, or even several species of microorganisms. Depending on the stage of production, or more specifically, the maturity of the gut, the goal of this culture can be the exclusion of pathogens from the naïve gut of a neonatal animal, or the displacement of an already established pathogenic bacterial population.

Some bacteria produce antimicrobial protein compounds (traditional antibiotics, as well as bacteriocins, or colicins) in order to eliminate competitive bacteria, and have therefore shown additional promise for their use in competitive exclusion products. Protein antibiotics are attractive alternatives to conventional antibiotics used in animal feed, since they are not absorbed intact by the animal and, therefore, leave no antibiotic residues in the meat. Additionally, bacteriocins have the potential for very favorable regulatory status by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Nisin, a bacteriocin, is generally regarded as safe for use as a food additive for its antimicrobial properties. The possibility of an effective antibiotic alternative being regulated as a food additive, rather than as a new animal drug, is further incentive for bacteriocin research among the animal health/feed industries.

Colicins are classified as either pore-forming or nuclease colicins based on their mode of bacteriocidal activity, and are further categorized based on their mode of membrane integration in sensitive bacteria. Members of both classes have been shown effective against gram-negative bacteria of concern for animal health and human food safety, such as E. coli and Salmonella strains, and therefore hold promise for use as alternatives to conventional antibiotics in animal diets.

Colicins are a class of bacteriocins produced by, and effective against E. coli and closely related members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Pore-forming colicins are between 387 and 626 amino acids in length, and provide their antibacterial effect by crossing the outer membrane, spanning the periplasm, and inserting into the bacterial inner cell membrane to form voltage-dependent ion channels. The ion leakage caused by these channels uncouples energy expenditures from growth, causing death in cellular targeted bacteria. Nuclease colicins kill sensitive cells by non-specific degradation of DNA or specific cleavage of rRNA.

Shiga toxin producing E. coli strains, such as 0157:H7, which present serious human food safety concerns, have also been shown to be sensitive to colicins. Doyle et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,965,128, discloses the use of colicin producing E. coli as probiotics in cattle to reduce E. coli 0157:H7 shedding. Further, Lyon et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,895, discloses the use of naturally produced colicins for inhibiting E. coli 0157:H7 and other Escherichia species, as well as Shigella species in food products, on carcasses, and on hard surfaces as a sanitizer.

Although colicins have shown potential as alternatives to conventional antibiotics in animal feed, it would not be cost effective to purify this protein from naturally occurring colicin producing E. coli strains, nor to include the levels of these bacteria necessary to obtain an antimicrobial effect in the feed.

It is therefore a primary objective of the present invention to produce alternatives to conventional antibiotics for use in the animal feed industry.

It is a further objective of the present invention to produce recombinant colicins in a yeast expression system.

It is a further objective of the present invention to produce recombinant colicins in a plasmid expression system.

It is still a further objective of the present invention to produce recombinant colicins that are effective against pathogenic bacteria.

It is yet a further objective of the present invention to produce recombinant colicins that may be used as a probiotic culture.

It is yet a further objective of the present invention to produce recombinant colicins that are effective against E. coli and Salmonella strains of importance to human food safety.

It is a further objective of the present invention to produce recombinant colicins that are effective against pathogenic bacteria that is cost effective.

The method and means of accomplishing each of the above objectives as well as others will become apparent from the detailed description of the invention which follows hereafter.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method for the production of colicins from a recombinant organism whereby a suitable host organism is transformed with a transformation cassette comprising a gene encoding a pore-forming or nuclease colicin. The transformed host organism is then cultured under suitable conditions, and the colicins recovered and purified. The invention further provides transformed hosts comprising expression cassettes capable of expressing colicins.

The suitable host organism used in the method is bacteria or yeast. The suitable host organism is more particularly selected from the group of genera consisting of Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Aerobacter, Lactobacillus, Aspergillus, Saccharomyces, Schizosaccharomyces, Pichia, Candida, Hansenula, Methylobacter, Escherichia, Salmonella, Bacillus, Streptomyces and Pseudomonas.

The invention is also embodied in a transformed host cell comprising a gene encoding for a colicin, and a host cell transformed with the gene, whereby the transformed host produces colicin, whereby the host cell is preferably P. pastoris or E. coli. The colicins of this invention have bactericidal activity against various strains of organisms that are of concern in animal health and food safety, including strains of E. coli and Salmonella. It has also been surprisingly found that the colicins have activity against strains of Listeria.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates the effect of Colicin E1 on the growth of Escherichia coli F4 (K88).

FIG. 2 illustrates the effect of Colicin E 1 on the growth of Escherichia coli F18.

FIG. 3 illustrates the effect of Colicin N on the growth of Escherichia coli F4 (K88).

FIG. 4 illustrates the effect of Colicin N on the growth of Escherichia coli F18.

FIG. 5 illustrates the effect of colicins A, N, and E1 (4.1 μg/ml for each individual colicin) on increase in optical density (600 nm) of E. coli 057:H7 strain 933. ◯, control; , colicin A-treated; Δ, colicin E1-treated; and ▴, colicin N-treated cultures.

FIG. 6 illustrates the effect of colicins A, N, and E1 (4.1 μg/ml for each individual colicin) on increase in optical density (600 nm) of E. coli 057:H7 strain 86-24. ◯, control; , colicin A-treated; Δ, colicin E1-treated; and ▴, colicin N-treated cultures.

FIG. 7 illustrates the effect of colicins A, N, and E1 on the maximal specific growth rates (h⁻¹) of E. coli 057:H7 strain 933. Δ, colicin A-treated; ◯, colicin E1-treated; and , colicin N-treated cultures.

FIG. 8 illustrates the effect of colicins A, N, and E1 on the maximal specific growth rates (h⁻¹) of E. coli 057:H7 strain 86-24. Δ, colicin A-treated; ◯, colicin E1-treated; and , colicin N-treated cultures.

FIG. 9 illustrates the effect of colicins A, N, and E1 on bacterial populations (CFU/ml) of E. coli 057:H7 strain 933 after 6 h of incubation. Δ, colicin A-treated; ◯, colicin E1-treated; and , colicin N-treated cultures.

FIG. 10 illustrates the effect of colicins A, N, and E1 on bacterial populations (CFU/ml) of E. coli 057:H7 strain 86-24 after 6 h of incubation. Δ, colicin A-treated; ◯, colicin E1-treated; and , colicin N-treated cultures.

FIG. 11 illustrates the lowest colicin E1 concentrations (μg/ml) on the maximal specific growth rate (h⁻¹) of E. coli 0157:H7 strains. Error bars indicate standard deviations.

FIG. 12 illustrates the effect of Colicin E1 on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes strain FSIS 1126.

FIG. 13 illustrates the effect of Colicin E1 on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes strain Scott A.

FIG. 14 illustrates the effect of Colicin E 1 on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes strain H7767.

FIG. 15 illustrates the effect of Colicin E1 on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes strain H7768.

FIG. 16 illustrates the effect of Colicin E1 on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes strain H7769.

FIG. 17 illustrates the effect of Colicin E1 on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes strain Scott A on an uncured ham slice.

FIGS. 18A and 18B illustrate the effect of Colicin E1 on the growth of five Listeria strains on an uncured ham slice at high (A) and low (B) inoculum of Listeria.

FIGS. 19A and 19B illustrate the effect of dietary Colicin E1 on growth performance in pigs, as described in Example 6. Data presented are means and standard errors. The control group is represented by the open bars and the Colicin group by the cross-hatched bars.

FIG. 20 illustrates the average fecal scores of pigs fed either a control diet or a diet containing 15 mg purified Colicin E1/kg diet, as described in Example 6. Fecal scores were recorded twice daily after challenge. A score of 0 was dry, formed feces, 1=soft, but formed feces, 2=pasty, green/brown in color, 3=tan and runny episodic, 4=tan and excessive, episodic, 5=watery and uncontrollable.

FIG. 21 illustrates the effect of Dietary Colicin E1 on fecal shedding of E. coli F18, as described in Example 6. All samples were plated on MacConkey's agar and incubated at 37° C. for 16 h prior to counting. Colony counting for the individual challenge strains was accomplished by selection on either naladixic acid (strain #1) or chloramphenicol (strain #2).

FIG. 22 illustrates coliform populations in the ileum of young pigs challenged with 2 strains of E. coli F18 four days post-challenge, as set forth in Example 6. All samples were plated on MacConkey's agar and incubated at 37° C. for 16 h prior to counting. Colony counting for the individual challenge strains was accomplished by selection on either naladixic acid (strain #1) or chloramphenicol (strain #2).

FIG. 23 illustrates a comparison of ileal gene expression in pigs fed a control diet versus pigs fed dietary Colicin E1, as set forth in Example 6. Determination of gene expression by real-time PCR was accomplished using primers designed using “PrimerQuest” software (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc). The optimal primer concentration for each primer set was determined, and we verified that the linearity of amplification for each gene over a 10 fold range of cDNA concentrations. All amplified products were sequenced to confirm their identities, and at the end of each real-time assay all samples were subjected to a melt curve to verify purity. Gene expression was normalized to cDNA concentration utilized in each reaction as determined by Picogreen staining.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The present invention provides a method for biological production of colicins in a recombinant organism. The method incorporates a microorganism containing a gene coding for a pore-forming colicin, such as colicins, A, B, E1, Ia, and N (Morlon et al., 1983; Mankovich et al., 1986; Pugsley, 1987), or a nuclease colicin, such as E2, E8, E9, E7, E5, E4, DF13, E6, or E3. Such colicins are easily isolated from nonpathogenic strains of E. coli using methods well known in the art. In comparison to conventional antibiotic prophylactic therapy, the present method provides a relatively inexpensive and environmentally responsible means of protecting swine and other animals from E. coli infections. Two pore-forming colicins in particular, namely E1 and N, have been demonstrated to be especially effective against the F18 and F4 strains of E. coli, respectively. Colicin E1 has also been shown to have extensive activity against L. monocytogenes. The colicins are produced as described above and purified using conventional methods, such as affinity chromatography.

The following definitions are to be used to interpret the claims and specification.

The terms “host cell” or “host organism” refer to a microorganism capable of receiving foreign or heterologous genes and of expressing those genes to produce an active gene product. The terms “organism(s)” and “microorganism(s)” shall be used interchangeably and will refer to prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms that exist in nature as single cells, where each cell is capable of sustaining life independently of other cells of the same type.

The terms “foreign gene”, “foreign DNA”, “heterologous gene” and “heterologous DNA” refer to genetic material native to one organism that has been placed within a host organism by various means.

The terms “recombinant organism” and “transformed host” refer to any organism having been transformed with heterologous or foreign genes. The recombinant organisms of the present invention express foreign genes encoding pore-forming or nuclease colicins.

“Gene” refers to a nucleic acid fragment that expresses a specific protein, including regulatory sequences preceding (5′ non-coding) and following (3′ non-coding) the coding region. The terms “native” and “wild-type” refer to a gene as found in nature with its own regulatory sequences.

The terms “encoding” and “coding” refer to the process by which a gene, through the mechanisms of transcription and translation, produces an amino acid sequence. It is understood that the process of encoding a specific amino acid sequence includes DNA sequences that may involve base changes that do not cause a change in the encoded amino acid, or which involve base changes which may alter one or more amino acids, but do not affect the functional properties of the protein encoded by the DNA sequence. It is therefore understood that the invention encompasses more than the specific exemplary sequences. Modifications to the sequence, such as deletions, insertions, or substitutions in the sequence which produce silent changes that do not substantially affect the functional properties of the resulting protein molecule are also contemplated. For example, alteration in the gene sequence which reflect the degeneracy of the genetic code, or which result in the production of a chemically equivalent amino acid at a given site, are contemplated. Thus, a codon for the amino acid alanine, a hydrophobic amino acid, may be substituted by a codon encoding another less hydrophobic residue, such as glycine, or a more hydrophobic residue, such as valine, leucine, or isoleucine. Similarly, changes which result in substitution of one negatively charged residue for another, such as aspartic acid for glutamic acid, or one positively charged residue for another, such as lysine for arginine, can also be expected to produce a biologically equivalent product. In some cases, it may in fact be desirable to make mutants of the sequence in order to study the effect of alteration on the biological activity of the protein. Each of the proposed modifications is well within the routine skill in the art, as is determination of retention of biological activity in the encoded products.

The term “expression” refers to the transcription and translation to gene product from a gene coding for the sequence of the gene product.

The terms “plasmid”, “vector”, and “cassette” refer to an extra chromosomal element often carrying genes which are not part of the central metabolism of the cell, and usually in the form of circular double-stranded DNA molecules. Such elements may be autonomously replicating sequences, genome integrating sequences, phage or nucleotide sequences, linear or circular; of a single- or double-stranded DNA or RNA, derived from any source, in which a number of nucleotide sequences have been joined or recombined into a unique construction which is capable of introducing a promoter fragment and DNA sequence for a selected gene product along with appropriate 3′ untranslated sequence into a cell. “Transformation cassette” refers to a specific vector containing a foreign gene and having elements in addition to the foreign gene that facilitate transformation of a particular host cell. “Expression cassette” refers to a specific vector containing a foreign gene and having elements in addition to the foreign gene that allow for enhanced expression of that gene in a foreign host.

The terms “transformation” and “transfection” refer to the acquisition of new genes in a cell after the incorporation of nucleic acid. The acquired genes may be integrated into chromosomal DNA or introduced as extrachromosomal replicating sequences. The term “transformant” refers to the product of a transformation.

The term “genetically altered” refers to the process of changing hereditary material by transformation or mutation.

Recombinant organisms containing the necessary genes that will encode colicins in accordance with this invention may be constructed using techniques well known in the art. In the present invention, genes encoding colicins A, B, E1, Ia, and N were isolated in the laboratory from nonpathogenic strains of E. coli obtained from the National Collection of Type Cultures (NCTC, London, UK) and used to transform host strains, such as E. coli DH5α, ECL707, AA200, JM109, or W1485; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Lactobacillus; P. pastoris or the Klebsiella pneumoniae strains ATCC 25955 or ECL 2106.

Methods of obtaining desired genes from a bacterial genome are common and well known in the art of molecular biology. For example, if the sequence of the gene is known, suitable genomic libraries may be created by restriction endonuclease digestion and may be screened with probes complementary to the desired gene sequence. Once the sequence is isolated, the DNA may be amplified using standard primer directed amplification methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (U.S. Pat. No. 4,683,202) to obtain amounts of DNA suitable for transformation using appropriate vectors.

Genes encoding colicins are well known in the art, as are their sources. See e.g. Pugsley and Oudega, 1987 and Giilor et al., 2004. It is contemplated that any gene encoding a pore-forming or nuclease colicin or having pore-forming or nuclease colicin-like activity is suitable for the purposes of the present invention, wherein that activity is capable of forming ion channels in the plasma membrane of bacteria, resulting in membrane depolarization, or capable of non-specific degradation of DNA or specific cleavage of rRNA in sensitive cells.

Suitable host cells for the recombinant production of colicin may be either prokaryotic or eukaryotic (yeast). Preferred hosts include Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Aerobacter, Lactobacillus, Aspergillus, Saccharomyces, Schizosaccharomyces, Pichia, Candida, Hansenula, Methylobacter, Escherichia, Salmonella, Bacillus, Streptomyces and Pseudomonas. Most preferred in the present invention are Pichia and Escherichia species, with P. pastoris and E. coli being most preferred for cost reasons.

The present invention provides a variety of vectors and transformation and expression cassettes suitable for the cloning, transformation and expression of colicins into a suitable host cell. Suitable vectors can be derived, for example, from a bacteria or a yeast. Protocols for obtaining and using such vectors are known to those in the art. (Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual—volumes 1,2,3 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., (1989)).

Suitable bacterial vectors for use in the invention are those that can be replicated in the host cells listed above. For example, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, constitutive expression of an E. coli colA gene is accomplished in Lactobacillus by placing this gene downstream of a strong Lactobacilli promoter sequence (Djordjevic et al., 1997). This plasmid and promoter sequence combination has been used successfully to express an E. coli gusA gene in L. gasseri (Russell and Klaenhammer, 2001).

In a preferred embodiment using a yeast system, expression of an E. coli colA gene is placed in correct reading frame behind the alpha-factor signal peptide of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This signal peptide has been shown to direct efficient secretion of recombinant E. coli proteins in yeast systems (Brake et al., 1984; Rodriguez et al., 1999; Stahl, 2001). In this embodiment, expression is preferably controlled by the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase promoter or alcohol oxidase I promoter, from a methylotropic yeast, Pichia pastoris. These promoters direct constitutive or inducible expression, respectively, of the gene of interest.

Typically, the vector or cassette contains sequences directing transcription and translation of the relevant gene, a selectable marker, and sequences allowing autonomous replication or chromosomal integration. Suitable vectors comprise a region 5′ of the gene which harbors transcriptional initiation controls and a region 3′ of the DNA fragment which controls transcriptional termination. It is most preferred when both control regions are derived from genes homologous to the transformed host cell although it is to be understood that such control regions need not be derived from the genes native to the specific species chosen as a production host. Examples of suitable vectors for use in the invention include Pgemt-Easy (E. coli T vector for subcloning PCR products); pGAPz (an integrative P. pastoris expression vector, also an E. coli shuttle vector; pGAPzα (an integrative P. pastoris expression vector, also an E. coli shuttle vector); pPICZα (an integrative P. pastoris expression vector, also an E. coli shuttle vector); pPICZ (an integrative P. pastoris expression vector, also an E. coli shuttle vector), and pTRK664 (Lactobacillus expression vector, and an E. coli shuttle vector).

Initiation control regions or promoters, which are useful to drive expression of the colicin encoding genes in the desired host cell, are numerous and familiar to those skilled in the art. Virtually any promoter capable of driving these genes is suitable for the present invention including but not limited to CYC1, HIS3, GAL1, GAL10, ADH1, PGK, PHO5, GAPDH, ADC1, TRP1, URA3, LEU2, ENO, TPI (useful for expression in Saccharomyces); Lactococcus lactis lacA and Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 (useful for expression in Lactobacilli); slpA AOX1 (useful for expression in Pichia); and lac, trp, λ P_(L), λP_(R), T7, tac, and trc (useful for expression in E. coli). Termination control regions may also be derived from various genes native to the preferred hosts.

Once suitable cassettes are constructed they are used to transform appropriate host cells. Introduction of the cassette containing the genes encoding the colicins, either separately or together into the host cell may be accomplished by known procedures such as by transformation (e.g., using calcium-permeabilized cells, electroporation) or by transfection using a recombinant phage virus. (Sambrook et al., supra.)

Fermentation media in the present invention must contain suitable carbon substrates. Suitable substrates may include, but are not limited to, monosaccharides such as glucose and fructose, oligosaccharides such as lactose or sucrose, polysaccharides such as starch or cellulose, or mixtures thereof, and unpurified mixtures from renewable feedstocks such as cheese whey permeate, cornsteep liquor, sugar beet molasses, and barley malt. Additionally, the carbon substrate may also be one-carbon substrates such as carbon dioxide, or methanol for which metabolic conversion into key biochemical intermediates has been demonstrated.

In addition to utilization of one and two carbon substrates, methylotrophic organisms are also known to utilize a number of other carbon-containing compounds such as methylamine, glucosamine and a variety of amino acids for metabolic activity. For example, methylotrophic yeast are known to utilize the carbon from methylamine to form trehalose or glycerol (Bellion et al., Microb. Growth C1-Compd., [Int. Symp.], 7th (1993), 415-32. Editor(s): Murrell, J. Collin; Kelly, Don P. Publisher: Intercept, Andover, UK). Similarly, various species of Candida will metabolize alanine or oleic acid (Sulter et al., Arch. Microbiol., 153(5), 485-9 (1990)). Hence, the source of carbon utilized in the present invention may encompass a wide variety of carbon-containing substrates and will only be limited by the requirements of the host organism.

Although it is contemplated that all of the above mentioned carbon substrates and mixtures thereof are suitable in the present invention, preferred carbon substrates are monosaccharides, oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, and one-carbon substrates. More preferred are sugars such as glucose, fructose, glycerol, sucrose and single carbon substrates such as methanol and carbon dioxide.

In addition to an appropriate carbon source, fermentation media must contain suitable minerals, salts, cofactors, buffers and other components, known to those skilled in the art, suitable for the growth of the cultures and promotion of the enzymatic pathway necessary for glycerol production.

Typically, cells are grown at 28-40° C. in appropriate media. Preferred growth media in the present invention are common commercially prepared media such as Luria Bertani (LB) broth, Sabouraud Dextrose (SD) broth, MS broth, Yeast Peptone Dextrose, BMMY, GMMY, or Yeast Malt Extract (YM) broth. Other defined or synthetic growth media may also be used and the appropriate medium for growth of the particular microorganism will be known by someone skilled in the art of microbiology or fermentation science.

Suitable pH ranges for the fermentation are between pH 4.0 to pH 9.0. Reactions may be performed under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. The present invention may be practiced using either batch, fed-batch or continuous processes and that any known mode of fermentation would be suitable.

Methods for the purification of proteins and polypeptides from fermentation media are known in the art. For example, polypeptides can be obtained from cell media by subjecting the reaction mixture to extraction with an organic solvent, distillation, ultrafiltration, and ion exchange chromatography, and column chromatography. The recombinant colicins of this invention may be identified directly by submitting the media to functional assay or high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The levels of expression of the colicin proteins are measured by bacterial inhibition assays and other methods well known in the art.

The following examples are offered to illustrate but not limit the invention. Thus, they are presented with the understanding that various modifications may be made and still be within the spirit of the invention.

Example 1 Colicin Production, Purification, and Efficacy Colicin Production and Purification

Colicin producing E. coli strains, obtained from the National Collection of Type Cultures (Public Health Laboratory Service, London, England), were inoculated into Luria Broth (LB) to a starting OD₆₀₀˜0.1, and incubated with shaking at 37° C. When the cultures reached an OD₆₀₀=0.9 colicin production was induced by the addition of 0.2 U Mitomycin C (Sigma)/mL culture. The cell free supernatant was obtained by centrifugation 5.5 h later, and concentrated by ultrafiltration in a stir-cell apparatus (Amicon, Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) across a regenerated cellulose membrane with a 30 kDa cut-off (Millipore). The concentrated sample was then desalted against 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8 and purified by ion exchange chromatography. The desalted samples were applied to a column containing Q Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway N.J.), equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0 (equilibration buffer), and exhaustively washed with the equilibration buffer. The bound protein was eluted with a continuous NaCl gradient using an AKTAprime chromatography system (Amersham Bioscience). The fractions containing the highest concentrations of colicin, determined by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomasie Blue staining, were pooled and concentrated by ultrafiltration. The protein concentrations of these samples were determined in each pooled sample (Lowry et al., 1951), and the percentage colicin was determined by densitometry using a 16 bit mexapixel CCD camera, FluorChem 8800, and FluorChem IS800 software (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, Calif.).

Inhibition of Growth Assays

Pure cultures of E. coli F4 (K88) and F18 were obtained from the culture collection at the USDA-ARS Federal Food Safety Research Unit (College Station, Tex.). These cultures were grown overnight in LB at 37° C. with shaking, and then used to inoculate a flask of LB to an OD₆₀₀˜0.05. The freshly inoculated LB was then aliquoted (5 mL) into culture tubes containing various colicin doses. The volume of the colicin doses was made constant by the addition of 10 mM Tris, pH 8. The total volume of each dose, including the 0 μg/mL colicin control, was 175 μL. These tubes were then incubated with shaking at 37° C., and their OD₆₀₀ determined hourly for six hours. Quantitative determination of the colony forming units (CFU) of the E. coli strains were obtained by serial dilutions and direct plating on LB, initially and 3 h post-inoculation. There experiments were repeated in triplicate, and the values presented are means.

Results Production and Purification of Colicins

Yields of 1.1 mg of purified Colicin N/L of culture and 7.6 mg of purified Colicin E1/L of culture were obtained with the aforementioned production and purification strategy. The purity of the Colicin N and E1 isolates were 30% and 85%, respectively, as determined by densitometry.

Efficacy of Colicin E1 Against Escherichia coli F4 (K88) and F18

Colicin E1 significantly reduced the growth rate of E. coli F4 (K88) with 10 μg/mL of culture (FIG. 1). A dose of 50 μg/mL was needed to inhibit all growth of F4 (K88) for 6 hours. A significant reduction in the growth of F18 was seen with as little as 0.25 μg Colicin E1/mL of culture, and a complete inhibition of growth for 6 hours was seen with 1 g/mL of culture (FIG. 2). Colicin E1 showed bactericidal activity against both E. coli F4 (K88) and F18. After 3 hours of incubation with 50 μg of Colicin E1/mL of media, there was approximately one log less F4 (K88) CFU/mL than in the initial inoculum (Table 1). This dose caused an approximately three log difference in F4 (K88) CFU/mL between the treated and untreated cultures. These same trends were also seen when F18 was incubated with only 1 μg of Colicin E1/mL of media. A dose of 100 μg of Colicin E1/mL caused a greater decline in E. coli F18 CFU/mL., but did not eliminate viable cells after three hours of incubation.

TABLE 1 Effect of Colicins on the Viability of Escherichia coli F4 (K88) and F18 After 3 Hours Incubation Colicin E1 Colicin N E. coli Dose, μg/mL CFU/mL Dose, μg/mL CFU/mL F4(K88) 0 3 × 10⁹ 0 3 × 10⁹ 50 5 × 10⁶ 10 1.1 × 10⁷   200 4 × 10⁶ 50 6 × 10⁵ F18 0 2 × 10⁹ 0 2 × 10⁹ 1 1.2 × 10⁶   50 1 × 10⁶ 100 5 × 10⁴ 100 4 × 10⁵ Initial CFU/mL were 6 × 10⁷ and 1 × 10⁷ for E. coli F4 (K88) and F18, respectively. Efficacy of Colicin N Against E. coli F4 (K88) and F18

Colicin N was effective in inhibiting the growth of E. coli F4 (K88) and F18 at doses of 1 and 10 μg/mL of culture, respectively. (FIGS. 3 and 4). To completely inhibit the growth of these strains for 6 hours required 25 μg of Colicin N/mL of F4 (K88) and 50 μg/mL of F18 (FIGS. 3 and 4). A 10 μg of Colicin N/mL of F4 (K88) dose did not allow any increase over the initial inoculum in the number of CFU/mL after 3 hours of incubation (Table 1). With this dose there was greater than a 3 log reduction in the F4 (K88) CFU/mL after 3 hours incubation, when compared to the control. After 3 hours of incubation with 50 μg of Colicin N/mL of media, there was approximately one log less F18 CFU/mL than in the initial inoculum (Table 1), and greater than three log less F18 CFU/mL than compared to the untreated culture after 3 hours incubation.

Discussion

Both of the E. coli strains considered primarily responsible for post-weaning diarrhea and edema disease in swine were sensitive to Colicin E1 and Colicin N. While both colicins inhibit the growth of these strains, their efficacy varied substantially. Colicin N was dramatically more effective than Colicin E 1 against E. coli F4 (K88). Significant reductions in growth of E. coli F4 (K88) were seen with 10 fold less Colicin N than Colicin E1 (FIGS. 1 and 2). With equal dosage (50 μg/mL), approximately 1 log fewer CFU/mL were seen with Colicin N than with Colicin E1, after three hours of incubation (Table 1). Colicin N was also more effective in reducing the growth of F4 (K88) than F18 (FIGS. 3 and 4). To completely inhibit the growth of F118 required approximately 10 fold more Colicin N than was needed for F4 (K88). The effectiveness of Colicin E1 against these E. coli strains was opposite that of Colicin N.

Colicin E1 was more effective against F18 than against F4 (K88), requiring approximately 50 fold less to completely inhibit the growth of F18 (FIGS. 1 and 2). Colicin E1 was highly effective against F18 with as little as 0.25 μg/mL dramatically inhibiting its growth. Complete inhibition of growth, for six hours, was obtained with only 1 μg/mL, while greater than 25 μg Colicin N/mL was required for the complete inhibition of growth. Although growth was completely inhibited at this dosage, even a 100 fold increase in Colicin D1 could not eliminate all of the viable F18 in culture. Approximately 5×10⁴ CFU/mL remained after 3 hours of incubation with 100 μg of Colicin E1/mL (original inoculum was 1×10⁷ CFU/mL).

Example 2 Inhibition of Growth of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 In Vitro Materials and Methods Colicin Production and Purification

Each colicin was produced from a specific colicin-producing E. coli K-12 strain (NC50129-01 containing plasmid pColA-CA31, NC50132-01 containing plasmid pColE1-K53, and NC50145-01 containing plasmid pColN-284) obtained from the National Collection of Type Cultures (Public Health Laboratory Service, London, UK). Cultures were inoculated into Luria-Bertani (LB) broth to an initial optical density of 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) of approximately 0.1 and incubated in a shaker at 37° C. When the cultures reached OD600=0.9, colicin production was induced by the addition of 0.2 U of mitomycin C per ml of culture (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, Mo.). The cell-free supernatant was obtained by centrifugation 5.5 h later and concentrated by ultrafiltration in a stir-cell apparatus (Amicon, Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) across a regenerated cellulose membrane with a 30-kDa cut-off (Millipore). The concentrated sample was then desalted against 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8, and purified by ion exchange chromatography. The desalted samples were applied to a column containing Q Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway N.J.), equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0 (equilibration buffer), and exhaustively washed with the equilibration buffer. The bound protein was eluted with a continuous NaCl gradient on an AKTAprime chromatography system (Amersham Bioscience). The fractions containing the highest concentrations of colicin, determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by Coomasie blue staining, were pooled and concentrated by ultrafiltration. The protein concentrations of these samples were determined in each pooled sample (20), and percent colicin was determined by densitometry with the use of a 16-bit megapixel charge-coupled device camera (FluorChem 8800, Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, Calif.) and FluorChem IS800 software (Alpha Innotech).

Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

E. coli 0157:H7 strains 933 (ATCC 43895) and 86-24 were obtained from the Food and Feed Safety Research Unit culture collection (U.S. Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, College Station, Tex.); both strains were originally isolated from human hemorrhagic colitis outbreaks. E. coli 0157:H7 strain 933 was naturally resistant to 25 μg/ml novobiocin and were made resistant to 20 μg/ml nalidixic acid by repeated transfer and selection. E. coli 0157:H7 86-24 was made resistant to streptomycin (100 μg/ml) by repeated transfer and selection. Differences in growth rates and antibiotic resistance profiles (other than for specifically selected and closely related antibiotics) were not detected between these antibiotic-resistant strains and wild-type parental strains (data not shown).

Escherichia coli 0157:H7 strains 933 (ATCC 43895) and 86-24 were anaerobically (90% N₂, 5% H₂, 5% CO₂ atmosphere) incubated at 39° C. in anoxic tryptic soy broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) to ensure colicin activity under anaerobic conditions similar to those within the gastrointestinal tract. Growth rates (n=2) were estimated via measurement of absorbance changes with a Spectronic 20D spectrophotometer (600 nm, Thermo Spectronic Inc., Madison, Wis.); growth rate was calculated with the formula (In OD2−ln OD₁)/ΔT. Final optical densities after 24 h of incubation were measured with a Gilford 2600 spectrophotometer (600 nm, 1-cm cuvette). Cultures with optical densities greater than 0.7 OD units were appropriately diluted in 0.9% NaCl.

Ouantitative Bacterial Enumeration

Samples were taken from incubations at 6 and 24 h to determine the effect of colicins on populations of E. coli 0157:H7. Samples were serially diluted (in 10-fold increments) in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.0) and subsequently plated on MacConkey's agar (supplemented with 25 μg/ml novobiocin and 20 μg/ml nalidixic acid for E. coli 0157:H7 strain 933 or with 100 μg/ml streptomycin for E. coli 0157:H7 strain 86-24) and incubated at 37° C. overnight for direct counting (CFU per milliliter).

Colicin Addition

To initially evaluate the effectiveness of these colicins against E. coli 0157:H7 strains, cultures were inoculated into tryptic soy broth tubes containing equivalent concentrations (4.1 μg/ml) of each of the individual colicins tested (A, E1, and N). To determine the effective range of doses for use in more complex mixed culture and in vivo studies, freshly inoculated tryptic soy broth was added (5 ml) to culture tubes containing concentrations (0 to 40.8 μg of each colicin per ml) of colicin A, colicin E1, and colicin N. The total volume of each colicin addition, including the 0 μg/ml colicin control, was 175 μl; the volume of the colicin dose was made constant by the addition of sterile, anoxic 10 mM Tris, pH 8. To determine the lowest effective dose of colicin E 1 against both E. coli 0157:H7 strains, cultures were grown in the presence of 0, 0.016, 0.032, 0.064, 0.128, 0.255, 0.51, 1.02, 2.04, 4.1, 7.7, 15.4, 28.8, and 40.8 μg of colicin E1 per ml.

Statistical Analysis

Experiments were performed in duplicate, and the values presented are means. Students' t test was used to determine significance of differences between means.

Chemicals

Unless specifically mentioned, all chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company.

Results

Effect of Colicins on E. coli 0157:H7

E. coli 0157:H7 grew rapidly in tryptic soy broth, but the addition of colicins affected growth (FIGS. 5 and 6). Colicin E1 significantly (P<0.05) reduced growth of both E. coli 0157:H7 strains 933 and 86-24 (FIGS. 5 and 6). Colicin N did not affect the growth rate of E. coli 0157:H7 strain 933 (FIG. 5) but did reduce the OD or growth rate of E. coli 0157:H7 strain 86-24 (FIG. 6). Colicin A did not affect the OD of either strain of E. coli 0157:H7. Colicin E1 significantly (P<0.05) reduced the specific growth rate of both strains of E. coli 0157:H7 examined at low concentrations (FIGS. 7 and 8). Colicin N was nearly as effective as E 1 against strain 86-24 but was not (P>0.10) effective against strain 933.

Regardless of the colicin dose used, all E. coli 0157:H7 cultures eventually grew overnight; therefore, final (24 h) optical densities were not significantly reduced in either strain by any of the colicins (data not shown).

Bacterial populations of both E. coli 0157:H7 strains were unaffected by colicin A (FIGS. 9 and 10). Treatment with colicin E1 significantly (P<0.05) reduced E. coli 0157:H7 populations by at least 4 log units for both strains tested, whereas colicin N significantly (P<0.05) reduced populations only for E. coli 0157:H7 strain 85-24 (FIG. 10). Because of the sensitivity of both strains of E. coli 0157:H7 to colicin E1, the efficacy of very low doses against these strains was examined. Colicin E1 reduced (P<0.05) the specific growth rate of both strains of E. coli 0157:H7 at concentrations below 0.1 μg/ml. (FIG. 11). In a negative control, Salmonella Typhimurium culture growth rates, final OD, and populations were not affected by any colicin treatment (data not shown).

Discussion

In this study, colicin E 1 was the most effective colicin. This result agrees with previous data indicating that colicin E1 displayed antimicrobial activity against several EHEC strains, not just 0157:H7. Other E-type colicins were found to be suitable candidates as “biopreservatives” against E. coli 0157:H7. However, other studies have indicated that the sensitivity of E. coli 0157:H7 strains to any single colicin can be highly variable. For example, only 1 of 18 colicins examined inhibited all 540 E. coli 0157:H7 strains screened. Because some E. coli 0157:H7 strains are colicinogenic and produce specific concomitant immunity proteins, they can be resistant to certain colicins or even a broad category of colicins. Therefore, simultaneous administration of a mixture of several categories of colicins should be considered as a treatment concept to reduce E. coli 0157:H7 (and other EHEC) in the gastrointestinal tract of food animals.

Example 3 Recombinant Expression of Colicins

Yeast expression vectors were constructed and verified by sequencing for Colicin A, B, E1, 1a, and N. Expression and secretion of an active Colicin A by Pichia pastoris were obtained, and confirmed by spot testing of cell-free supernatant of Pichia pastoris expressing Colicin A against E. coli DH5α. In the functional assay (spot testing) 110 μl of cell-free supernatant from transformed P. pastoris showed a clearing of approximately the same size as 1 μg of purified Colicin A from E. coli. Spot 2 showed 1 μl of cell-free supernatant from P. pastoris. Spot 3 showed 5 μl of cell-free supernatant from P. pastoris, and spot 4 showed 10 μl of cell-free supernatant from P. pastoris.

Example 5 Efficacy of Colicin E1 against Listeria monocytogenes FSIS 1126, H7769, Scott A, H7768, and H7767 Broth Culture Studies

Five isolated strains of Listeria monocytogenes. [one clinical isolate (Scott A) and four meat product isolates (FSIS 1126, H7769, H7762 and H7764)] which all carry the serotypes (1/2a, 4b) for human clinical illness, were grown and evaluated for sensitivity to colicin E1.

Inoculum Preparation

Growth studies were conducted to determine the optical density of cultures when they reached 10,000 CFU/ml. For each of the five cultures examined, frozen glycerol stock cultures (9.5 log CFU/ml) were thawed at room temperature, and 100 μl was added to 9 ml of sterile Trypticase soy broth containing 0.6% yeast extract (TSBYE). Cultures were then grown overnight at 37° C. Then 1 mL of this overnight growth was inoculated into 99 ml of fresh TSBYE and incubated at 37° C. The optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of the cultures and CFU/mL was determined hourly. Colony forming units (CFU)/mL were determined by serial dilution in peptone water followed by plating on Modified Oxford Listeria Selective Agar (MOX).

Testing for Sensitivity to Colicin E1

Pure cultures were inoculated from overnight growth into fresh TSBYE and allowed to grow to reach 10,000 CFU/ml. Aliquots (10 mL) were placed into culture tubes containing 0, 1, 10, or 100 μg of Colicin E1. This corresponds to doses of 0, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/ml. The Colicin was a highly purified preparation that was provided at 1 mg Colicin E1/mL in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.6. The volume of each aliquot was made constant by the addition of 10 mM Tris, pH 7.6. Optical density (OD) was determined at 600 nm, and was recorded hourly. CFU/mL were determined at 1, 3, and 6 hours post-inoculation. Colicin doses were provided at μg/mL of culture. The results are shown in FIGS. 12-16.

Discussion

All of the L. monocytogenes strains were sensitive to Colicin E1. Colicin E1 was more effective against H7767, H7768, and H7769 than against FSIS 1126 and Scott A. Complete inhibition of growth, for three to six hours, was obtained with only 0.1 μg/mL.

Ham Study #1—Scott A

Individual strain preparation: One mL of overnight growth of L. monocytogenes (Scott A) was inoculated into 99 ml of fresh TSBYE and allowed to grow to reach 1E7 (10,000,000) CFU/ml. Sample preparation: Sterilized ham slices (245 cm², 0.5 inch thick) were completely submerged in the Listeria culture for 10 min, and then transferred into sterile vacuum bags. One ml of 10 mM Tris, pH 7.6 containing 0, 10, or 50 μg Colicin E1 was placed into each bag and massaged using a stomacher for 60 seconds. Packages were then vacuum packaged and placed at refrigeration temperature (10° C.) for 3 days. On day 0, 1, 2 and 3, duplicate samples of colicin dose were pulled from refrigeration, aseptically cored (12.5 cm²) and transferred to stomacher bag containing 25 ml 0.1% peptone water. Samples were mixed for 60 seconds, and then serially diluted, using 0.1% peptone water, and plated onto MOX and incubated at 37° C. for 24 hours. Colonies from each sample on duplicate plates were counted and data were converted to log CFU/cm² of core isolated.

FIG. 17A depicts the CFU/cm² of Scott A on the uncured ham slice.

Ham Studies #2-5 Strain Cocktail

Inoculum Preparation: One mL of overnight growth of each of the five Listeria strains studied in the Broth Culture Studies was inoculated into 99 ml of fresh TSBYE and allowed to grow to reach either 1 E8 (100,000,000) (High inoculum) or 1 E5 (Low inoculum) CFU/ml. Ten ml of each culture was placed into 80 ml sterilized 0.1% peptone water and the five diluted cultures were then combined (450 ml) into a prex pan for submerging ham slices. This allowed for a cocktail inoculum that provided either 1 E7 or 1 E4 CFU/mL. Sample preparation: Sterilized ham slices (232 cm², 0.5 inch thick) were sliced aseptically in half and placed into a prex pan containing the 5 strain Listeria cocktail. The ham slices were emerged totally for a period of 10 minutes, and then transferred into sterile vacuum bags. A total volume of 2 ml of 10 mM Tris, pH 7.6 containing either 0, 1, 10, or 50 μg/mL, was added to each bag and massaged using stomacher for 60 seconds. Packages were then vacuum packaged and placed at 4° C. for 3 days. On day 0, 1 and 3, duplicate samples of each inoculum level and colicin concentration were pulled from refrigeration, aseptically cored (12.5 cm²) and transferred to stomacher bag containing 10 ml 0.1% peptone water. Samples were mixed for 60 seconds, and then serially diluted using 0.1% peptone water, plated on MOX and incubated at 37° C. for 24 hours. Colonies from each sample on duplicate plates were counted and data were converted to log CFU/cm² of core isolated.

FIGS. 18A and 18B depict the CFU/cm² of the Listeria strain mixture on the uncured ham slice (2 log CFU=100 CFU).

Example 6 Efficacy of Dietary Colicin E1 in Preventing Post-Weaning Diarrhea and Edema Disease in Young Pigs

The following study demonstrates that dietary Colicin E1 is effective in preventing post-weaning diarrhea and edema disease in young pigs.

Sixteen newly weaned pigs, genotyped for susceptibility to E. coli F18 infection, were utilized in this study. These pigs were weaned at 17 days of age and fed a diet without antibiotics for 4 days. Pigs were then fed either the control diet or a diet containing 15 mg of purified Colicin E1/kg feed. Two days later, all pigs were orally inoculated with 2×10¹⁰ CFU of two different strains of E. coli F18 in 20% dextrose and 5% dry milk. Fecal scores were recorded twice daily after challenge. A score of 0 was dry, formed feces, 1=soft, but formed feces, 2=pasty, green/brown in color, 3=tan and runny episodic, 4=tan and excessive, episodic, 5=watery and uncontrollable.

On day 4 post challenge, pigs were euthanized by captive bolt and ileal sections collected for histopathology analysis, RNA extraction, and colony forming units (CFU) determination. Ileal sections used for histopathology were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and subjected to hemotoxylin and eosin staining for analysis. The results are shown in FIGS. 19-23.

FIG. 19A demonstrates that none of the pigs fed the Colicin E1 diet failed to gain or lost weight, while 3 of the 8 control pigs either failed to gain or lost weight. Further, while 5 of 8 control pigs had at least two fecal scores of 4, while the Colicin E1 pigs had none. (FIG. 19B).

FIG. 20 shows the average fecal scores of pigs fed the control diet versus pigs fed the Colicin E1 diet. Overall, the pigs fed the Colicin E1 diet had much lower average fecal scores, ranging from about 0 to less than 2, while most of the control pigs had average fecal scores of greater than 2 and up to 4.

FIG. 21 shows the effect of dietary Colicin E1 on fecal shedding of E. coli F18. The control pigs had a much higher degree of fecal shedding of both F18 strains #1 and #2.

FIG. 22 shows coliform populations in the ileum of young pigs challenged with 2 strains of E. coli F18 four days post challenge. While the control pigs exhibited a total of close to 1.E+08 CFU/g of ileal coliforms, the Colicin E1 pigs exhibited only about 1.E+06 CFU/g.

FIG. 23 demonstrates that feeding Colicin E1 reduces the expression of genes associated with inflammatory response, such as Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa) and beta (TNFb).

Example 7 Efficacy of Dietary Colicin E1 in Preventing Post-Weaning Diarrhea in Young Pigs

This study we examined the efficacy of dietary inclusion of ColE1 in preventing experimentally induced PWD. Twenty-four weaned pigs (18d of age), genotyped to be susceptible to E. coli F18 infections, were individually housed and fed diets containing either 0, 11, or 16.5 mg ColE1/kg diet. Two days after the start of the trial, all animals were orally inoculated with 1×10⁹ CFU of 2 E. coli F18 strains isolated from pigs with PWD. The dietary inclusion of ColE1 decreased the incidence and severity of PWD and improved the growth performance of the piglets, as shown in Table 2 below. Additionally, dietary addition of ColE1 affected the gene expression of iNOS, IL-1β, and TNFβ in ileal tissue of these animals. The study further demonstrated that dietary inclusion of ColE1 may be an effective alternative to conventional antibiotics in the diet of swine for the prevention of PWD.

TABLE 2 Effect of Colicin E1 on the Incidence and Severity of PWD Feed Feed Group ADG SEM intake SEM efficiency SEM Control 0.4^(a) 0.16 1578^(a) 62 3.6 0.94 High 0.9^(b) 0.16 1398^(b) 62 1.98 0.74 Low 0.5^(a) 0.16 1222^(b) 62 2.83 0.74 Values within a column not sharing a common superscript are significantly different (P < .05).

The prophylactic use of antibiotics in animal agriculture has been greatly scrutinized in recent years, due to concerns regarding its role in contributing to antibiotic resistance. This scrutiny has led to increased regulation over the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture, and will likely continue towards a zero tolerance for the useof prophylactic or growth promoting antibiotic use in animals. With this regulatory milieu in mind, it is essential for the sustainability of animal agriculture to examine alternatives to conventional antibiotics to improve animal health and production efficiency. Because of their efficacy against E. Coli, colicins are a viable alternative to conventional antibiotics in swine production. The present invention also demonstrates that colicins are highly effective against Listeria strains. The present invention demonstrates that colicins may be economically and readily synthesized using recombinant techniques.

For the above-stated reasons, it is submitted that the present invention accomplishes at least all of its stated objectives.

Having described the invention with reference to particular compositions and methods, theories of effectiveness, and the like, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that it is not intended that the invention be limited by such illustrative embodiments or mechanisms, and that modifications can be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention, as defined by the appended claims. It is intended that all such obvious modifications and variations be included within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims. The claims are meant to cover the claimed components and steps in any sequence which is effective to meet the objectives there intended. 

1. A method of inhibiting the growth of Listeria in animals comprising: introducing to an animal a bacterial growth inhibiting effective amount of a colicin, whereby the colicin is selected from the group consisting of colicin A, colicin B, colicin E1, colicin Ia, and colicin N, said amount being sufficient to inhibit growth of a Listeria strain, said strain being selected from the group consisting of FSIS 1126, H7769, Scott A, H7768 and H7767.
 2. (canceled)
 3. The method of claim 1 whereby the colicin is recombinant colicin.
 4. (canceled)
 5. A method of reducing Listeria on food/animal feed comprising: applying a colicin selected from the group consisting of A, B, E1, Ia, and N to the food or animal feed.
 6. The method of claim 5 whereby the colicin is a recombinant colicin.
 7. (canceled)
 8. The method of claim 5 whereby the colicin is applied to meat.
 9. A method of reducing pathogenic bacteria Listeria on animal carcasses comprising: applying a colicin selected from the group consisting of A, B, E1, Ia, and N to an animal carcass. 10-11. (canceled)
 12. The method of claim 9 whereby the colicin is recombinant.
 13. A method of reducing Listeria in animals comprising: feeding the animal a colicin selected from the group consisting of A, B, E1, Ia, and N.
 14. (canceled)
 15. The method of claim 13 whereby the colicin is recombinant.
 16. (canceled)
 17. A method of reducing colonization of pathogenic bacteria Listeria in the gastrointestinal tracts of animals comprising: feeding the animals an amount sufficient of one or more colicins selected from the group consisting of A, B, E1, Ia, and N to prevent colonization of pathogenic bacteria.
 18. The method of claim 17 whereby the colicin is a recombinant colicin. 19-21. (canceled)
 22. The method of claim 1 whereby the method decreases the incidence and severity of post-weaning diarrhea in pigs. 